![]() |
No high_priority replace?
I didn't realize this before, but apparently you can't use HIGH_PRIORITY on REPLACE statements, only with INSERT queries - does anybody know if this is because REPLACE are already considered high priority? It doesn't clarify in the dox whether they are or not.
If not, I wonder if reverting to INSERT HIGH_PRIORITY IGNORE would be better practice for critical queries? |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 03:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0