 |
Account Login
|
 |
 |
Latest Articles
|
 |
 |
IRC Channel
|
 |
 |
Associates
|
 |
 |
Associates
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
03-10-2008, 03:08 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
The Prestige
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,044
Thanks: 193
|
Prototype vs. jQuery vs. Mootools
Which from all three would be the best umm, framework? You could say. I use Prototype personally, I tried some jQuery, but I found Prototype a bit easier, Mootools, well I haven't tried it yet.
__________________
VillageIdiot can have my babbies ;d
|
|
|
|
03-10-2008, 03:41 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
The Frequenter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 460
Thanks: 49
|
At my work, DreamCreek, we use Mootools. Haven't gotten into it that much because of school, but I haven't tried out jQuery or Prototype.
__________________
"Life is a bitch, take that bitch on a ride"
|
|
|
03-10-2008, 03:42 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
The Prestige
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,044
Thanks: 193
|
Mootools, seem to be very popular, I'll check it out today! :]
__________________
VillageIdiot can have my babbies ;d
|
|
|
|
03-10-2008, 04:07 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Moderateur
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,393
Thanks: 5
|
I use jQuery all the time, but have worked with Mootools, Prototype and a whole host of other framework. Somehow I always fall back on the simplicity that is jQuery.
|
|
|
|
03-18-2008, 07:34 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
The Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 60
Thanks: 10
|
I'm a jQuery advocate, to me, it just feels right, the other frameworks feel too verbose to me.
|
|
|
|
03-19-2008, 10:12 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
The Frequenter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 438
Thanks: 3
|
I recommend Prototype simply because it's the only one I've worked with for some time now (about 3 or 4 months). MooTools it's pretty stuffed, while jQuery has a difficult syntax to remember. And yes, I have used jQuery to to some javascript & flash integration and it made my life a living hell. I think you should just use what fits you best.
__________________
I have optimistic thoughts, even though sometimes (if not always) life's a bitch.
|
|
|
|
05-16-2008, 05:28 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
The Acquainted
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 119
Thanks: 21
|
I've used them all. I think Prototype is "easiest" to implement simple effects in. I use them all depending on what I am looking for an wanting to implement...
|
|
|
|
05-16-2008, 05:42 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
how quixotic are you?
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lapeer, MI
Posts: 445
Thanks: 37
|
I like to use Mootools. jQuery is confusing and buggy. :-|
|
|
|
|
05-16-2008, 05:54 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Wizard
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,299
Thanks: 17
|
Jquery, because they got to me first and I haven't had a reason to change.
|
|
|
|
05-17-2008, 01:28 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
The Acquainted
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Newcastle, UK
Posts: 113
Thanks: 3
|
I've tried mootools and prototype but I prefer jQuery aswell.
|
|
|
05-18-2008, 01:40 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
The Acquainted
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 106
Thanks: 13
|
Hello There.
I´ve tried:
1. Prototype with Scriptaculous
2. JQuery
3. Mootools
Some how i seem to prefer Prototype and JQuery at the moment perhaps because i´ve used them the moast.
And i like the easy way you can make effects the easy way with Prototype together with Scriptaculous.
Good luck!
__________________
Of course the whole point of a doomsday machine, would have been lost if you keep it a secret.
|
|
|
|
06-15-2008, 09:38 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
The Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 44
Thanks: 3
|
I use mootools since their 0.83 version. I've been pretty happy with it.
|
|
|
|
06-24-2008, 07:23 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
The Prestige
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sweden, Stockholm
Posts: 1,080
Thanks: 115
|
Mootools. No need to tell why, it's just.. pure ownage. Ofcourse, it's based on user preferences..
__________________
|
|
|
|
06-25-2008, 10:57 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
The Acquainted
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 170
Thanks: 18
|
jQuery, because I first tried it, and I like the amount of good plugins for it.
|
|
|
|
07-09-2008, 01:01 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
The Frequenter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: In my basement
Posts: 386
Thanks: 47
|
Jquery is great for doing a hell of a lot of simple Javascript with one line of code.
Prototype is great for Ruby.
They work together with a wonderful function:
Code:
jquery.noConflict()
__________________
Signatures are nothing but incriminating.
Last edited by Aaron : 01-06-2009 at 12:42 PM.
|
|
|
07-09-2008, 01:27 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
The Frequenter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 352
Thanks: 8
|
From past experince I've only played with Moo, and I really enjoy mootools for my needs, it can solve rather large tasks and we use it at work for our new SSO system thats ajax based =)
I havn't tried jQuery, mainly because Mootools contain all I need as it looks now
__________________
|
|
|
07-10-2008, 05:02 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
The Visitor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 4
Thanks: 3
|
Mootools ... ;)
I tried jquery and prototype too, but I liked mootools most so I'm using it ... ;)
|
|
|
07-10-2008, 05:52 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
how quixotic are you?
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lapeer, MI
Posts: 445
Thanks: 37
|
I have been using jquery lately because I need it to use Mark it up! and it isn't too bad once you get used to it. It also helps that they have a lot more tutorials on the site now. I have also been using the cool Impromptu plugin for, well, prompts!
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|