11-13-2007, 03:31 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
The Wanderer
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildhoney
Personally I don't know what they've done with ActionScript CS3. CS2 was bad enough with the way it did things, but in CS3 they've gone and over-complicated matters even more - piling more inconsistencies on top of more inconsistencies. There's definitely an open market out there right, especially considering the appalling excuse of a documentation that Adobe have put out for ActionScript. I can really see Microsoft's Silverlight taking the bull by the horns and trampling all over Adobe's Flash.
Nevertheless, I'm sure you'll hear a lot more of my opinions on the inside :) So let me say welcome to the community, Shafique! Hope you enjoy your stay.
|
I agree with your opinion on CS3. CS2 wasn't that bad if you came from a PHP or Javascript background. But when they rolled out CS3, they tried to change it into a more sophisticated, OOP-style language similar to that of C; and they failed miserably. They just ended up adding useless functions and making things even more complicated than they originally were.
Anyways, glad to be here Adam. :) |
|
|