06-01-2008, 01:15 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
La Vida es Sueño
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oldham
Posts: 1,578
Thanks: 72
|
Pleasure  !
In theory though you could go down the abstract path, with something like so:
php Code:
abstract class Database_Abstract { abstract function insertRow ($aData); abstract function updateRow ($aData, $iRowId); abstract function deleteRow ($iRowId); public function __construct () { printf("Connection established\n"); }}class Database_MySQL extends Database_Abstract { public function insertRow ($aData) { return 'Insert MySQL'; } public function updateRow ($aData, $iRowId) { return 'Update MySQL'; } public function deleteRow ($iRowId) { return 'Delete MySQL'; }}$pDb = new Database_MySQL (); echo $pDb-> insertRow(array(1, 2));
However, the reason I would take the former path, as aforesaid in my earlier post, is due to the logging and other centralised functionality that would be beneficial to the overall harmony of a database class. Whenever you make a call in the former, you can perform any generic tasks, such as logging, whereas if you take the latter route, with abstracts, you'll have to set-up logging in each individual child class, or at least call a function from the abstract.
__________________
The man who comes back through the Door in the Wall will never be quite the same as the man who went out.
|
|
|